Philosophy Hour · Episode 42
Inherent Meaning or Diy
1,807 words
Tommy the Hamburger is in Philosophy Hour. This is where I take the fucking big questions that usually get dressed up in polite little college words, drag them into real life, and see what survives. No fake wisdom, no clean answers, just the hard shit that keeps crawling around in your head after midnight.
Meaning is one of those words people talk about like it is hidden somewhere waiting to be found.
Like your purpose is behind the couch with the remote and if you just breathe correctly, journal hard enough, or quit the wrong job dramatically enough, it will stroll out and introduce itself.
I do not buy that clean version anymore.
That is tonight's problem. Is meaning something inherent, something already there in the bones of existence, or is it something we build under pressure because the alternative is spiritual starvation?
The pressure point for this one is a community garden in a city lot that used to be good for nothing but cracked asphalt, broken bottles, and the kind of trash that tells you a place has been unofficially declared not worth caring about.
Now it has tomato cages, bad plywood benches, compost bins held together by optimism and zip ties, kids carrying watering cans too big for their wrists, and adults pretending they are just talking about mulch when everybody in the place knows they are really talking about whether life can still mean something after the jobs, marriages, ideologies, and institutions that once held them up have gone to shit.
There is a woman there who recently quit a high paying job that looked prestigious from the outside and felt dead from the inside. She tells people she "found" meaning in the garden. I understand why she says that. It feels nicer. Cleaner. Less embarrassing than saying she was spiritually suffocating and this is one of the first places in years where her body stopped screaming at her.
But that word, found, keeps nagging at me.
Did she find meaning?
Or did she start making it the second she committed to showing up, hauling soil, learning names, staying late, listening to old people talk, helping kids grow food, and placing her labor somewhere it was not immediately converted into bullshit for somebody higher on the food chain?
That difference matters.
Because if meaning is inherent, then the task is discovery. Uncover the true self. Hear the calling. Listen to the universe. Follow the thread. Your job is to notice what was always there.
If meaning is constructed, then the task is harder and less romantic. You do not uncover it. You compose it. Under constraint. With partial information. In damaged conditions. Sometimes while depressed, overworked, underloved, politically furious, physically tired, and not at all convinced any of it will hold.
That second version feels a lot more honest to me.
Nietzsche already knew the old inherited meaning structures were collapsing. God is dead and all that. But what people miss is that he was not celebrating easy freedom. He was naming a terrifying vacancy. If the old cosmic guarantees are gone, then value does not descend pre certified. Somebody has to create, rank, choose, affirm. Meaning becomes work, and not everybody wants that job.
Viktor Frankl took it somewhere else. Meaning can still be made in horror, he says, in deprivation, in camps, in suffering so extreme it should have shattered all philosophy into powder. I respect that. Deeply. But even Frankl gets used too cheaply now, turned into motivational wallpaper for people who want to tell the miserable that suffering is an opportunity. Sometimes suffering is just damage. Sometimes the meaningful thing is not transcending it heroically but reducing it, sharing it, naming its causes, and refusing to let somebody else's profit model call it destiny.
That is why the garden matters to me as a scene. Because nothing about it is mystical. There is no heavenly soundtrack. No revelation. No self help glow. It is work. Dirt under the nails. Scheduling. Arguments. Dead plants. Mosquitoes. Somebody forgot the hose again. Somebody overwatered. Somebody brought food. Somebody cried quietly on a bench after getting a rent notice. Somebody else showed up the next day anyway.
And somehow, in all that very local, sweaty, unimpressive repetition, meaning starts appearing.
Or maybe not appearing.
Accumulating.
That is a better word.
The place begins to hold memory. Labor. Witness. Small usefulness. Shared time. Shared burden. A person who thought they were empty suddenly finds they are expected somewhere on Tuesday. A kid who thought adults only show up to punish them learns one will show up to teach them how to keep basil alive. A man who thought retirement was just waiting to die starts building trellises and saying weirdly beautiful shit while handing people cucumbers.
That does not feel like discovering a sacred script.
It feels like making a world that can throw meaning back at you because you put something into it first.
This is where existentialism still earns its keep for me. Sartre gets caricatured into "you are free, choose, blah blah," but the harder point is that we are condemned to create under conditions we did not choose. No prewritten role arrives to save us. You still have to live. You still have to answer. You still have to decide what counts when no divine customer service agent confirms your ticket number.
But I also do not want to go full DIY guru and act like meaning is just a personal craft project.
That is another lie.
People do not build meaning from nowhere.
They inherit languages, wounds, obligations, capacities, neighborhoods, debts, possibilities, prohibitions. Some people are handed institutions that affirm their value. Some are handed systems that grind them until "find your purpose" starts sounding like a sick joke.
That is the part I wish more people would say plainly. Meaning is not discovered on a level field. Some people start with mentors, time, money, safety, and enough calm to ask elegant questions about calling. Other people are trying to assemble meaning while dodging eviction, racism, surveillance, debt, caretaking labor, chronic pain, and jobs that siphon off every coherent thought before dinner. If you ignore that unevenness, then all your philosophy about purpose turns into a backhanded way of flattering the already resourced.
That is why the social dimension matters so much. bell hooks, Angela Davis, all the people who understood that selfhood is shaped inside structures, remind me that meaning is never merely private. If your whole life is organized by precarity, surveillance, racism, misogyny, poverty, or extraction, then the question of purpose is already political. The system is trying to tell you what your life is for. Cheap labor. Service. obedience. invisibility. If you create other meanings in defiance of that, that is not just therapy. That is resistance.
Fuck me sideways, purpose can be insurgent.
That is also why I hate the way corporations talk about meaning now. They love purpose. Mission. Impact. Values. They want your soul at work because it is cheaper than paying you properly. They want to convert your hunger for meaning into loyalty to an institution that would replace you before lunch if the quarter demanded it. "Bring your whole self to work" from a boss who would cut your healthcare in an email blast is one of the filthiest sentences in modern life.
So no, I do not trust meaning that arrives prepackaged from above.
And I do not fully trust meaning that is only a mood either.
For me, meaning gets real when it links inner life to outer usefulness without collapsing either one.
Not productivity for its own sake.
Not empty authenticity either.
Something more like this: a pattern of action, relation, memory, and value that makes your life feel less accidental because it is actually tied to lives beyond your own skin.
That can happen in art.
In organizing.
In caregiving.
In teaching.
In gardening.
In repair.
In study.
In protecting somebody.
In refusing a role the world tried to assign you.
And yes, sometimes it feels discovered because when it starts working, it resonates. Your body calms. Your mind sharpens. Your time feels less wasted. But I think that sensation of recognition comes after construction more often than people want to admit. You do not find meaning like a fossil. You build enough of the right conditions that something starts feeling like it fits.
Maybe that is why the argument gets so muddled. Built meaning can still feel discovered from the inside. After enough repetition, enough commitment, enough shared labor, the thing you made starts meeting you halfway. It answers back. It develops gravity. And then people say, "Ah, there it was all along." Maybe. Or maybe that is just how human beings describe the shock of finally participating in something that does not treat them like an instrument.
So where do I land?
I do not think meaning is fully inherent in the cheap comforting sense people often want.
I do not think the universe stamped each of us with one sacred career path and then hid the paperwork in a canyon somewhere.
I think meaning is made, but not arbitrarily.
It is made in contact with reality, with other people, with history, with need, with desire, with skill, with pain, with what your life can actually protect, nourish, or make more possible.
That means you cannot simply declare anything meaningful and be done with it.
But it also means you are not doomed to wait for revelation.
That part matters to me a lot. If meaning had to arrive as a certainty before we acted, most people would die waiting. Waiting for the perfect call. The perfect vocation. The perfect sign. The perfect feeling. Meanwhile life keeps billing you, grieving you, asking things of you, and moving without your philosophical consent. A made meaning is not fake just because it began as an experiment. A lot of the truest things in life start that way.
They start awkwardly.
Half believed.
Unearned at first.
And then, if you stay, they slowly become true enough to live inside.
That matters more than destiny.
You can begin.
In mud.
In grief.
In confusion.
In a borrowed lot.
In a room you did not expect to save you.
That is enough for me.
Not because it is tidy.
Because it gives people back some agency without lying about how damaged the world already is.
And because every time I see somebody stop asking, "What was I made for?" long enough to start asking, "What can I help make matter here?" something in the whole question gets less pathetic and more alive.
That's Philosophy Hour. No neat answer, no bow on it, just a question that hits different once you have to carry it back into your actual life.